RGB: Not at this time, no. The Muslim troops still make up the majority of Ottoman soldiers, but have much in common with their western counterparts in recruitment, being more like feudal levies. This of course may or may not change in time.
EnragedKiwi: Albania is not independent later, actually. Because of conversion efforts and a number of campaigns, not to mention the passage of time, the Muslim Albanians are one of the ethnicities (much like the Greeks) that become very closely tied with the Ottoman Empire. That region is just a very stable region of the Ottoman Empire. Other places, such as Croatia or the Hungarian regions, are not so stable.
Winner: Hes a big fan of the monarchies.
Stuyvesant: Or is it? *Da da duuuuum!*
I actually am running through ideas about where to take this AAR if/when I finish it. I might just continue the story of the Ottoman Empire in HoI3. I am also already working on a few custom events and whatnot for later in the AAR that will link the two games together and let me explain and describe the missing century and a half.
phargle: You are definetly a very perceptive man. Not only is Albania a still-stable part of the Empire, but Krieger is in some ways a mix of conservative and liberal. The man is a dedicated monarchist and, while he himself is of upper-middle-class stock, he is dissmissive towards the lower classes.
Yet while a monarchist he is not opposed to some reforms of government. I would definelty label him as being one who wouldn't oppose a constitutional monarchy, but his feelings and biases would make him suspicious of weakening royal authority too much or in allowing universal sufferage. Hes not a perfect man, not by a long shot. Actually, hes almost the kind of academic who deserves to be slapped. :rofl: