King Trpimir Trpimirovic (1090-1137)
It shall be a struggle to summarise the life of King Trpimir in one chapter, however I shall try to be brief and not dwell on the details. King Trpimir meant many things to many people and his life helped to shape Croatia as a true Central European power, rather than just a minor Kingdom living in the shadow of the larger Kingdom of Hungary and the Empires of Byzantium and the Holy Roman Empire. We shall present some more of these views towards the end.
King Trpimir was officially the first born son of King Petar, yet the astute reader will remember that King Petar could not be the father of King Trpimir, as he was conceived and born in the time that King Petar was away campaigning in the Holy Land. Nevertheless, King Petar trusted enough in his wife’s fidelity that he accepted his ‘son’. When King Petar died in 1090, King Trpimir rose to the throne at age 4. A Regency Council governed for the first 12 years of this reign, and their effect can only be described as disastrous.
The lands controlled when the Regency Council began in 1090.
The Regency Council would see several wars, and would only win the war against England. Byzantium declared war within a year of King Trpimir ascending to the throne, leading to a war that would see the loss of Zeta and Ragusa – the gains that King Petar had made during his lifetime. Soon afterwards a war with Hungary began and the Regency Council prepared for a defensive war, yet they accepted a peace treaty whereby they signed the treasury over to King Geza of Hungary. Further, the small holdings in the Holy Land that were loyal to Croatia defected to the local Emirates.
Meanwhile war with England had started and after several years of warfare and near-constant losses a peace would be signed with the English. However, these constant losses were not the most important effect they would have on the Kingdom. Instead they would also fill King Trpimir with the idea that he should entrust more power with his nobles – they even went so far as to implement Feudal Contract law. Further, they were able to persuade him that they were the ones most capable of filling their respective posts, leading to a severe shortage of talent as time wore on and they died.
Eventually, in 1101 King Trpimir rose to the throne. The Kingdom at this time was different to the one King Petar had left for him. He lacked most of the Serbian holdings, as well as having a vastly depleted treasury and no land in the Holy Land. There was a lot of work that needed to be done in order to ensure the Kingdom was sustainable going into the future.
The Kingdom when King Trpimir took over from the Regency Council.
When King Trpimir rose to the throne, instead of turning south and making a rash attack on the Byzantines in an effort to reclaim land instead turned north. He looked first at the Duchy of Carniola, which he managed to subdue, thanks to some intriguing. Shortly afterwards, in an effort to assist his staunch allies France, he launched an attack on Corfu which, while successful, would ultimately be lost to a large counter-assault.
1111 saw a second war with Hungary begin – truly at this point reconciliation between the two Kingdoms was not possible. The numbers that could be mustered by both Kingdoms was roughly equal and as such the war should have been close. However, King Trpimir was successful in breaking through the initial armies and then pouring into the Hungarian countryside. The war was a resounding success and saw several counties added to King Trpimir’s domain.
At around this time King Trpimir started to set himself at odds with the Church. Initially it was because he kept a Muslim in his court at a time of Crusading, and then he went against an official Church ruling on an omen. Things would quickly deteriorate and King Trpimir was declared a heretic. This was all the opportunity that was needed for King Trpimir’s greedier vassals and as such they began a civil war. The new Duchy of Carniola was the first to revolt, followed by the recently conquered County of Ancona (Led by King Trpimir’s first wife Ambrosia). At about this point King Trpimimr joined the Crusade (Though took very little part in it) in exchange for no longer being declared a heretic.
The Civil War started well for the loyalists, and the County of Veglia was granted independence (temporary though it would prove) in exchange for the Duke of Carniola giving up the rest of his titles. The Count of Zachlumina soon declared himself independent as well and he too was made to pay for this transgression. King Trpimir also granted the County of Ancona independence, though Duke Nikola would later inherit it when Ambrosia died. The Civil War by now was putting a large strain on the Kingdom’s finances and eventually King Trpimir had to stop paying to maintain his own fortresses in Senj.
The Civil War took several years break towards the end of the 1110’s, but restarted again in 1120, when the Duchy of Slavonia declared itself independent. This was the true test of King Trpimir’s military abilities – the Duchy comprised almost a third of the land of the Kingdom. Eventually they were overcome and the Duke was forced to pledge allegiance to King Trpimir. The Civil Wars together cost more lives than any Croatian wars to that point.
Shortly after the end of the Civil War, King Trpimir made the only contribution he could afford to the Crusade. He raised a small force and took over Venice, which had recently been occupied by some Mulsims. This would prove to have a great economic effect on the Kingdom. However, all was not destined to go well with the Kingdom from this point.
In 1125 the nobility arrived at King Trpimir’s court and forced him to change the inheritance laws so that each of his sons would inherit the titles equally. This was to have grave effects on the Kingdom when King Nikola eventually ascended to the throne. It was this one act that caused another rupture in the Kingdom – the Duchy of Bosnia broke off and began another Civil War. This time vengeance came swiftly and Rama was reclaimed, though Hum was granted independence. At this point King Trpimir realised that he would not be able to achieve the goal King Petar was seeking – a unified Croatia and Serbia. As such, he decided that in good time he would turn his attention to the north. Fortunately, his vassals were more than happy to do this and Aquileia accepted the offer of vassalisation the Nikola, Duke of Carniola, would offer them. Veglia was also brought back into the Kingdom forcibly.
Late in 1134 the final war King Trpimir was to ever fight came to the fore. The Kingdom of France attacked the Holy Roman Empire, and King Trpimir honoured his alliance with them and joined the war. The war went far better than expected and King Trpimir succeeded in annexing the Duchy of Carinthia, meaning he was now in control of most of south-eastern Germany. The title of Duke would be granted to Duke Nikola to prepare him for the succession. The war with German continued for some time until the threat of a naval assault on Senj forced King Trpimir to sign a white peace.
King Trpimir would eventually die, perhaps from an STD caught from one of his mistresses. With his death he left a large set of challengers to Duke Nikola. The Duke would have to find a way to integrate the German Counties, while simultaneously keeping peace amongst much-strengthened rivals. These issues will be dealt with in the next book, where we look at the life of King Nikola.
The Kingdom at the end of King Trpimir’s reign.
Turning now to what his life meant to the various people of Croatia at various time, we see many different interpretations. In terms of religion, he was a poster child for the Lutheran and Protestant movements that would eventually arrive after the Reformation due to him being openly opposed to the church. Of course he never broke from his Catholic Faith, yet that does not mean people have assumed he was somewhat sceptical of the Pope and the established Church.
To the Nationalist movements of the 19th and 20th Century, even up to the present day, he was the man who almost doubled the size of Croatia’s lands, and who always put the good of Croatia first. Of course it is unlikely that he cared about anything beyond his own good, and that of his family. Indeed in his own day it is unlikely that many peasants liked him, given that he had a complete disregard for the plight of the average person – as evidenced by him refusing to subsidise the fishermen who had not caught anything.
To Croatian nobility over the years there has always been a divide between those who believe that him ceding power to his nobles was a good thing, and those who believe that by decentralising power he compromised the good of the Kingdom. When nobility write his history (And he has had almost as many biographies written about him as his predecessor King Petar) they can usually be easily slotted into one of these camps. Both camps have several good points – it is likely that the nobility having more power helped to revolutionise the Croatian army, yet at the same time it did noticeably reduce the stability of his Kingdom.
Ultimately King Trpimir’s life cannot be easily summarised into one book alone. We must look at every view that has ever been expressed about him, and then decide which one makes the greatest arguments. For this reason no true biography of King Trpimir can ever be written – no facts could escape from the analysis of the views of other historians. Yet, if we are to succinctly summarise King Trpimir’s life we can should look no further than Jonathon Fulcrum’s famous quote about King Trpimir:
“King Trpimir was always seeking out new lands to conquer, for one reason or another and as such we should describe him as a Conqueror. His life was a constant struggle to lift Croatia up from being a second-tier Kingdom to being a true contender in the power politics of Central Europe. However, he was constantly beset by struggles, both economic and social. These struggles meant that he was constantly forced to commit wicked deeds, which would constantly overshadow the good that he did for his Kingdom. Ultimately, his life was a positive for the Kingdom as a whole, if not always for the people within it.”
Dr. Fulcrum treads the fine line of praising King Trpimir and admonishing him for the bad that he did to the world – yet ultimately this quote provides the best summary of King Trpimir’s life that could be hoped for. Now begins a new book with the life of King Nikola Trpimirovic.